top of page

📢 STT 訂閱專區已上線

免費文章會照常更新,一篇都不會少。訂閱是「加強版」——每週深度週評、財報法說的完整判讀、所有長篇深度報告全包。

免費讓你跟上,訂閱讓你看懂、能做判斷。

月訂 NT$199|年訂 NT$2,000(約 NT$167/月)
👉 立即訂閱: vocus.cc/salon/simpletechtrend

800G vs 1.6T Optical Modules: A BOM Teardown Across One Generational Leap, and Who Really Captures the Margin

2 hours ago
2 min read

2026 is being called "the year of 1.6T." But if you only watch Innolight's and Eoptolink's shipment volumes, you'll miss where the profit actually happens. The best reference frame for understanding 1.6T is the previous generation, 800G, so let's tear the two down side by side.

Start with price. 800G is a mature product, now priced at around US$400; 1.6T is still early on its curve at roughly US$1,300-1,500. Comparing like with like, the jump from 800G to 1.6T raises ASP by about 150% while bandwidth only doubles. Cost per bit has to fall, so long-run volume pricing for 1.6T will converge toward US$800. The key anchor: 800G at US$400 (0.8T) works out to exactly the same cost per bit as 1.6T at US$800 (1.6T), parity between generations. 1.6T is walking 800G's old path, shifted up one generation.

800G is mature and flat at US$400; 1.6T is currently about US$1,400 and converging toward US$800 long-term, matching mature 800G on a per-bit basis.
800G is mature and flat at US$400; 1.6T is currently about US$1,400 and converging toward US$800 long-term, matching mature 800G on a per-bit basis.

The bill of materials is nearly identical across generations (8 light sources + 2 TIAs + 2 drivers + 1 DSP); the difference is the generational spec: 100G to 200G per lane. (Note: TIAs and drivers are electronic ICs (EICs), counted separately in both discrete and SiPh designs and not integrated into the SiPh PIC; the main difference lies in the light source.)

Next, the generational jump in chip unit prices:

  • DSP: 800G about US$XXX (XXX at volume) → 1.6T about US$XXX, lead time XXX weeks

  • EML light source: 800G uses 100G EMLs at US$XXX → 1.6T uses 200G EMLs at US$XXX, XXX times more per unit

  • SiPh penetration: about 40-45% at 800G → rising to 60% for short-reach 1.6T

  • The BOM share structure is similar across both generations (DSP is the largest at 25-40%, light sources next), but doubled ASP means the absolute dollar value of every item doubles too


And 200G EMLs are now in short supply (a 20-60% gap, depending on how you measure), with lead times stretching to the end of 2027 and prices still rising. The hardest bottleneck is hiding in this BOM.

That's the summary of this article.

STT's full analysis: who is really capturing the margin along this BOM, which items will keep rising, which will be knocked out by domestic Chinese suppliers or LPO, and the truth about the SiPh bottleneck. It is all in the paid section.



Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page