top of page

📢 STT 訂閱專區已上線

免費文章會照常更新,一篇都不會少。訂閱是「加強版」——每週深度週評、財報法說的完整判讀、所有長篇深度報告全包。

免費讓你跟上,訂閱讓你看懂、能做判斷。

月訂 NT$199|年訂 NT$2,000(約 NT$167/月)
👉 立即訂閱: vocus.cc/salon/simpletechtrend

CPO Lasers Don't Have to Chase 400 mW: NPO With Built-In Lasers Brings the Bar Back to Taiwan's Home Turf

2 days ago
2 min read

The standard answer for a CPO light source is the external laser ELSFP: 200 mW out of the module, 300–400 mW required at the chip, and only a handful of companies such as Lumentum and Coherent can make it in volume.

At ECOC 2026, Ryan Yu of TeraHop, a subsidiary of Innolight, demonstrated another path: putting the laser directly inside the NPO. Removing the front-panel ELSFP, the polarization-maintaining fiber, and a set of connectors cuts about 3 dB of loss from the optical path, so laser power can drop a notch. With an entire row of light-source slots gone from the front panel, the switch may even shed 1U.

At the same ECOC, Lumentum, which sells high-power lasers, spelled out the specs itself: CPO needs 25–26 dBm (about 316–400 mW), while NPO needs only 21–23 dBm (about 126–200 mW). A 3–4 dB difference in the bar produces a completely different list of who can supply, and the volume sweet spot of Taiwan’s CW laser chain (70–100 mW) sits right at the door of the NPO window.

Inside the premium section

  • A full breakdown of the two light-source routes, and where that 3 dB comes from

  • Mechanical breakdown: how removing the ELSFP shrinks the switch from 2U to 1U

  • Energy breakdown: the laser segment drops from about 2.5 to about 0.85 pJ/bit, plus NVIDIA’s 30 W / 9 W breakdown and Coherent’s measured 4.7 pJ/bit

  • Reliability: TeraHop’s shipment data, plus the line on Lumentum’s slide, laser FIT << module FIT

  • CW laser power map: the 21–23 dBm and 25–26 dBm windows, and where each vendor’s published power falls

  • The light-source leaders’ own roadmaps: Coherent puts “built-in laser” in the next box of its evolution chart, plus the 2031 crossover point

  • Taiwan’s supply chain: how 7 Taiwanese companies divide up the whole InP chain, and why InP has no consumer-grade rescue like VCSEL had

  • Counterarguments: Coherent’s four reasons for external lasers, NVIDIA’s position, and how long the timeline could stretch

  • Four signals to watch

──────────────────────────────

That’s the summary of this piece.

STT’s full analysis, covering how the CW laser supply chain will reshuffle once the laser power bar drops 3–4 dB and where Taiwanese companies’ real opportunities and bottlenecks lie, is in the premium section, with 7 original charts.

👉 Subscribe to STT Premium and read the full analysis on vocus (in Chinese):

──────────────────────────────

This article is for technology and industry trend analysis only and does not constitute investment advice.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page