top of page

📢 STT 訂閱專區已上線

免費文章會照常更新,一篇都不會少。訂閱是「加強版」——每週深度週評、財報法說的完整判讀、所有長篇深度報告全包。

免費讓你跟上,訂閱讓你看懂、能做判斷。

月訂 NT$199|年訂 NT$2,000(約 NT$167/月)
👉 立即訂閱: vocus.cc/salon/simpletechtrend

External Laser Sources Are No Longer a Stopgap: ECOC Drew the ELS Spec Line, and the Ticket Isn't 400 mW

2 days ago
2 min read

For the past two years, when it came to CPO light sources, the market compared only one number: output power. 100 mW, 200 mW, 400 mW — the claims kept climbing. With the laser placed outside the module (External Laser Source, ELS) and light delivered to the silicon photonics engine via polarization-maintaining fiber, more power was always better, because one source has to feed many channels.

CIOE and ECOC in September 2026 pushed this into a new stage. At its booth, OIF ran a multi-vendor ELSFP interoperability demo headlined by a 1331 nm cooled UHP Class light source; the seven-part Open CTS / Open CPX specification led by Ciena was released less than six months after the group formed, accommodating both external and integrated light sources; Coherent used its own ELSFP to drive two NPOs in a live demo, reporting 4.7 pJ/bit and stating explicitly that the figure includes the ELSFP itself. Even more important were the demand tiers Lumentum gave — NPO needs 21–23 dBm, CPO needs 25–26 dBm — and SCINTIL's item-by-item breakdown of the OIF / OCI ELS specs: >200 mW, wall-plug >10%, RIN far below −140 dB/Hz, linewidth around 1 MHz.

The significance is not technical but in the supply chain: once a component has a public interface spec, it turns from "a part inside one company's module" into an item that can be compared, second-sourced and kicked off the list. And the field it's compared on is no longer power.


In the Paid Section

  • Where the 400 mW figure comes from, and why it is now only half of the entry ticket

  • The seven OIF / OCI spec fields for ELS, including measurement bands and temperature ranges

  • CoC design freedom reverse-engineered from the 13.0 × 16.0 × 5.1 mm gold box

  • The 4.7 vs. 5.6 pJ/bit energy battle, and the two attack numbers of 3 dB / 1.5 dB

  • Why FIT both helps and hurts ELS

  • Five companies' public numbers on a single power axis — who makes the cut

  • The one line from the integrated-laser camp that ends up endorsing external light sources

  • Taiwan's supply chain link by link: who can supply CoC, who can make gold boxes and FAUs, and the two real bottlenecks

  • Eight counterarguments and five signals to watch

That's the summary of this article's key points.

STT's full analysis — how the supply chain reshuffles once this spec line is drawn, and which segment Taiwan can realistically hold — is available in the paid section, with 3 original charts.

👉 Subscribe to the STT paid section and read the full analysis on vocus (in Chinese): https://vocus.cc/article/6ab4ea93fd89780001675085


Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page